Table 3.
Comparison of efficacy of supernatant and sediment capsules.
| Supernatant/Sediment * Succes/Failure Crosstabulation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success/Failure | Total | ||||
| Success | Failure | ||||
| Supernatant/Sediment | Supernatant | Count | 15 | 1 | 16 |
| Expected Count | 13,1 | 2,9 | 16,0 | ||
| Sediment | Count | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| Expected Count | 9,9 | 2,1 | 12,0 | ||
| Total | Count | 23 | 5 | 28 | |
| Expected Count | 23,0 | 5,0 | 28,0 | ||
| Chi-Square Tests | |||||
| Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | Exact Sig. (2-sided) | Exact Sig. (1-sided) | |
| Pearson Chi-Square | 3,429a | 1 | ,064 | ||
| Continuity Correctionb | 1,831 | 1 | ,176 | ||
| Likelihood Ratio | 3,519 | 1 | ,061 | ||
| Fisher’s Exact Test | ,133 | ,089 | |||
| Linear-by-Linear Association | 3,307 | 1 | ,069 | ||
| N of Valid Cases | 28 | ||||
a2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,14.
bComputed only for a 2x2 table.