Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: Health Commun. 2020 Dec 19;37(4):515–524. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1853897

Table 3.

Coding Results: Factors Influencing POAAGG Genetic Study Participation

Category Code Sub-Code Dimension Mentioned in Interview Sum* (freq.)
Anticipated outcomes Benefit to self Personal benefits of study participation, including improving or maintaining personal health, learning about glaucoma, free and/or convenient access to glaucoma specialists, and compensation 46 (92%)
Unhappy with current provider Dissatisfaction with current eyecare provider; mentions of seeking new provider 6 (12%)
Accessibility Program efforts that facilitated study participation, including assistance with transportation, expedited appointment booking, wheelchair and walker accessibility, no charge for appointment, and/or hosting local screening outreach event 11 (22%)
Compensation Compensation for study participation or lunch provided during appointment or outreach event 8 (16%)
Benefit to others Desire to improve glaucoma care and treatment options for others through study participation 25 (50%)
Personal factors Family history Family members diagnosed with glaucoma or at risk of glaucoma 12 (24%)
Racial identity Respondent’s race or ethnic identity as playing a role in his/her decision to participate in the study 32 (64%)
Normative influences Prior conversation Family member or friend encouraging participation; Learning of study from other participants 8 (16%)
Attended with others Attending appointment and/or outreach with friend or family member 3 (6%)
WURD Learning about study from WURD 32 (64%)
Reservations Any reservation Concern about participating in genetic research due to history of exploitation of Black people in research 17 (34%)
Reservations of others (only) General concern of others in the Black community, but not explicitly for self 8 (16%)
Personal reservations Concerns for self 9 (18%)
*

Total number of interview transcripts (n=50; 1/ respondent) coded “true” for relevant code. Categories are not mutually exclusive.