Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;151:102626. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102626

Table 8.

Heterogeneity of farming contract treatment effects [T-C].

Rice Area
(ha)
Yield
(kg/ha)
Market Participation (%)
Income per Capita (US$)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Household size (n) −0.003
(0.009)
−2.919
(16.86)
−0.175
(0.337)
−12.18∗
(7.216)
Age of household head (years) 0.003
(0.003)
2.018
(7.329)
−0.079
(0.156)
−2.682
(3.175)
Male headed household (=1) 0.081
(0.068)
−87.07
(130.2)
−2.953
(2.487)
45.55
(48.75)
Experience producing rice (years) −0.009
(0.009)
2.643
(17.13)
−0.166
(0.261)
−13.97∗
(7.075)
Primary education (=1) −0.098
(0.097)
214.1
(183.3)
2.091
(3.573)
6.050
(79.74)
Farming is main activity (=1) 0.031
(0.126)
283.0
(236.5)
2.175
(4.230)
169.5
(130.3)
Training in rice production (=1) 0.054
(0.072)
230.8∗
(138.5)
5.068∗
(2.599)
−24.43
(58.60)
Member of farm assoc. (=1) 0.121
(0.173)
300.1
(294.5)
−1.347
(9.146)
−117.1
(96.99)

Note: Columns present ANCOVA regressions with covariates and arrondissement fixed effects for the four outcome variables as the dependent variable. Each row designates which covariate is interacted with the treatment indicator. Cells report the coefficient and standard error on the interaction term of covariate (row) and treatment indicator on the dependent variable (column). Standard errors clustered at the farmer-group-level are in parentheses (∗∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗p<0.05, ∗p<0.10).