Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 20;17(1):113–122. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02781-1

Table 2.

Rate of confidence sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for physical examination signs of abdominal and pleural free fluid

Physical examination signs Fraction of confident, % Diagnostic performances according to previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses [10, 11]
Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Positive LR (95% CI) Negative LR (95% CI)
Abdominal free fluid
 Flank dullness 66 0.84 (0.68–1.00) 0.59 (0.47–0.71) 2.0 (1.5–2.9) 0.3 (0.1–0.7)
 Fluid wave 52.6 6.0 (3.3–11.1)
 Shifting dullness 49.2 0.62 (0.47–0.77) 0.90 (0.84–9.6) 0.4 (0.3–0.6)
 ‘Glaçon’ sign 28 0.77 (0.60–0.88) 0.72 (0.63–0.81) 2.7 (1.9–3.9)- 0.3 (0.2–0.6)
Pleural free fluid
 Diminished breath sounds 90.6 0.42–0.88 0.83–0.90 4.3–5.2* 0.2–0.6*
 Dullness to percussion 79.9 0.73 (0.61–0.82) 0.91 (0.88–0.93) 8.7 (2.2–33) 0.3 (0.1–3.3)
 Reduced tactile vocal fremitus 31.6 0.82 0.86 5.7 (4.0–8.0) 0.2 (0.1–0.4)
 Asymmetric chest expansion 25.2 0.74 0.91 8.1 (5.2–12.7) 0.3 (0.2–0.5)
 Pleural friction rub 35.9 0.05 0.99 3.9 (0.8–18.7) 1.0 (0.9–1.0)

CI confidence interval, LR  likelihood ratio.

*No pooled analysis because the data was per lung region or hemithorax, not per patient