Table 1.
Current tools available for lactic acid bacteria genome editing
Tools | Examples of partial applications | Characteristics | References |
---|---|---|---|
Plasmids-based allelic exchange | Lc. lactis, S. thermophilus, E. faecalis | Homologous recombination-dependent; marker free; time-consuming | [19, 20] |
DsDNA recombineering | Lb. plantarum, Lb. casei | Recombinase-mediated; high efficiencies for both deletion and insertion; marker-dependent | [29, 30] |
SsDNA recombineering | Lb. reuteri, Lc. lactis, Lb. plantarum, Lb. gasseri | Mutation efficiency 0.4–19%; applicable to genomic mutagenesis; marker free | [31] |
CRISPR–Cas-assisted recombineering | Lb. reuteri, Lc. Lactis | High efficiency (up to 100%) for small deletions (< 1.0 kb in Lb. reuteri, < 100 bp in Lc. lactis); marker free | [35, 36] |
CRISPR–Cas9D10A | Lb. casei | Used for both gene deletion and insertion (25–65%); simplified editing procedure; marker free | [39] |
CRISPRi | Lb. plantarum, Lc. lactis | Used to repress multiple target genes simultaneously; reversible effects; precise targeting; marker free | [40–43] |