Table 4:

Comparison of pooled ORs and heterogeneity after adjustment

Genetic model	Subgroup	N	OR	P value	I2%	OR adjusted*	P-value adjusted*	I2% adjusted*
GT+TT vs GG	Overall IIP	13	4.34 [3.22, 5.84]	<0.0001	69%	5.13[4.41,5.97]	<0.0001	37%
	Asian	4	2.09 [1.44, 3.05]	<0.0001	46%	4.13[2.15,7.95]	<0.0001	0%
	Caucasian	9	4.95 [3.85, 6.35]	<0.0001	52%	4.95 [3.85, 6.35]	<0.0001	52%
	IPF	10	4.39 [3.17, 6.10]	<0.0001	75%	5.22[4.46, 8.10]	<0.0001	42%
T vs G	Overall IIP	22	4.03 [3.34–4.86]	<0.0001	79%	4.38[3.82,5.03]	<0.0001	34%
	Asian	4	2.64 [1.60–4.34]	<0.0001	27%	4.05[2.11, 7.78]	<0.0001	0.40
	Caucasian	18	4.22 [3.47–5.14]	<0.0001	81%	4.43[4.07, 4.83]	<0.0001	33.89
	IPF	18	4.06 [3.31–4.97]	<0.0001	83%	4.47[4.10, 4.87]	<0.0001	30.71

Note:

^*adjusted by removing the data of Jiang H et al. and Noth I et al