Table 2.
Construct reliability and validity
| Constructs | Item | HPE | SC | CUI | CR | CA | FVIF | Normal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Professional Encouragement | HPE1 | (0.928) | −0.026 | −0.079 | 0.956 | 0.931 | 1.434 | No |
| HPE2 | (0.955) | 0.033 | −0.042 | |||||
| HPE3 | (0.927) | −0.029 | 0.013 | |||||
| Security Concerns | SCl | 0.082 | (0.818) | −0.014 | 0.901 | 0.835 | 1.207 | No |
| SC2 | −0.015 | (0.877) | 0.043 | |||||
| SC3 | −0.089 | (0.905) | 0.084 | |||||
| Continuous Use Intention | CUI1 | 0.035 | −0.133 | (0.771) | 0.872 | 0.782 | 1.656 | No |
| CUI2 | −0.085 | 0.173 | (0.813) | |||||
| CUB | −0.111 | 0.076 | (0.912) |
Note: All loadmgs significant at p < 0.001; CR = composite reliability; CA = Cronbach’s alpha; FVIF = full collinearity variance information factor; Normal = normal distribution (robust Jarque-Bera). HPE = health professional encouragement; SC = security concerns; CUI = conti nuous use intention