Table 12.
Items | Phytase HM treatments, FYT/kg feed |
SEM |
P-value |
Linear |
Quadratic |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | 187.5 | 375 | 750 | 1125 | 1500 | 1875 | 2250 | |||||
Body weight, g | ||||||||||||
D 8 | 193 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 193 | 0.3 | 0.08 | 0.68 | 0.11 |
D 17 |
652a |
687b |
691b |
710 bc |
716 bc |
710 bc |
724c |
716 bc |
7.3 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
D8 to 17 | ||||||||||||
WG, g | 460a | 495b | 499b | 518 bc | 524 bc | 518 bc | 532c | 523 bc | 7.3 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
FI, g | 572a | 600 ab | 609 ab | 618b | 621b | 608 ab | 640b | 622b | 10.0 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.05 |
FCR, g/g |
1.244 |
1.215 |
1.220 |
1.195 |
1.187 |
1.174 |
1.205 |
1.190 |
0.017 |
0.10 |
0.01 |
0.06 |
Excreta | ||||||||||||
Ca retention, % | 55.08a | 63.00b | 66.03b | 73.14c | 74.64c | 75.70c | 73.43c | 73.19c | 0.84 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
P retention, % | 64.41a | 71.46b | 75.63c | 80.52d | 82.48d | 83.31d | 81.95d | 81.87d | 0.65 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Phytate-P degradation, % |
64.01a |
77.03b |
82.99c |
89.17d |
92.88 de |
94.38e |
91.86 de |
94.56e |
0.97 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Bone | ||||||||||||
Ash, % | 46.80a | 50.14b | 51.22 bc | 52.36 cd | 52.93 cde | 53.56 de | 54.67e | 53.74 de | 0.46 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Ca, % | 17.10a | 18.26b | 18.57 bc | 19.07 bcd | 19.22 cd | 19.38 cd | 19.96d | 19.38 cd | 0.20 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
P, % | 8.05a | 8.61b | 8.91 bc | 9.22 cd | 9.38 de | 9.44 de | 9.67e | 9.39 de | 0.09 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Means with different superscript within the same row differ significantly (P < 0.05).
∗ Phytate-P consisted of the P bound by phytate (and its degradation products).
The negative control (NC) was deficient in phosphorus (P). The phytase HM treatments were NC supplemented with phytase HM at the indicated FYT/kg feed.
SEM: standard error of mean; WG: weight gain; FI: feed intake; FCR: feed conversion ratio; Ca: calcium.