Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 7;12:612177. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.612177

Table 4.

Significant groups differences in the strength of rsFC between nodes extracted from the DMN and the FPN network.

Connectivity between nodes Connectivity between corresponding network(s) Observed t-value p*
Raw model
Control vs. cerebrovascular event
F DMN node ⇔ M DMN node DMN ⇔ DMN −1.81 0.011
R posterior temporal node ⇔ L dorsolateral prefrontal node FPN ⇔ FPN 1.62 0.021
R frontal pole node ⇔ L frontal pole node FPN ⇔ FPN −1.85 0.008
R parietal node ⇔ R frontal pole node FPN ⇔ FPN 1.85 0.009
R posterior temporal node ⇔ M DMN node FPN ⇔DMN −1.55 0.028
R posterior temporal node ⇔ R DMN node FPN ⇔DMN 1.89 0.006
L parietal node ⇔ L DMN node FPN ⇔DMN 2.04 0.003
L parietal node ⇔ F DMN node FPN ⇔DMN 1.41 0.044
L dorsolateral prefrontal node ⇔R DMN node FPN ⇔DMN 2.12 0.002
Minor stroke vs. TIA
R DMN node ⇔ M DMN node DMN ⇔ DMN 2.95 0.006
R frontal pole node ⇔ R dorsolateral prefrontal node FPN ⇔ FPN 2.35 0.022
Corrected model (age and vascular risk factors)
Control vs. cerebrovascular event
L Dorsolateral prefrontal node ⇔R DMN node FPN ⇔DMN −2.18 0.035
Minor stroke vs. TIA
R DMN node ⇔ M DMN node DMN ⇔ DMN 2.63 0.013
R frontal pole node ⇔ R dorsolateral prefrontal node FPN ⇔ FPN 2.68 0.013
*

maxT corrected.

Positive t observation indicates higher rsFC in left group compared to right group.

DMN, default mode network; FPN, frontoparietal network; L, left; R, right; F, front; M, medial.