Table 3.

Provider Acceptability

	Never (N (%))	Sometimes (N (%))	Always (N (%))
Prior to this study, how often did you ask patients about any social needs that they may have?	3 (13.0)	12 (52.2)	8 (34.8)
	Strongly agree/agree (N (%))	Neither (N (%))	Strongly disagree/disagree (N (%))
It is essential our clinic provide information about resources to address the following:
1. Food	19 (82.6)	2 (8.7)	2 (8.7)
2. Housing	19 (82.6)	2 (8.7)	2 (8.7)
3. Transportation	20 (87.0)	2 (8.7)	1 (4.4)
In general, the tablet-based screening process:
1. This strategy is compatible with the way I think things should be done	18 (78.3)	4 (17.4)	1 (4.4)
2. This strategy is more cost-effective that my usual approach to helping patients with unmet social needs	11 (47.8)	8 (34.8)	4 (17.4)
3. Compared with my usual approach, this strategy will result in my patients having better access to resources	17 (73.9)	5 (21.7)	1 (4.4)
4. Using this strategy will save me time	11 (47.8)	10 (43.5)	2 (8.7)
5. This strategy is a reliable method of helping patients with unmet social needs	15 (65.2)	7 (30.4)	1 (4.4)
6. Pieces or components of this strategy can be used by themselves	14 (60.9)	7 (30.4)	2 (8.7)
7. This strategy is suitable for helping patients access resources	18 (78.3)	4 (17.4)	1 (4.4)
8. Using this strategy does not involve making major changes to the way I usually do things	15 (65.2)	4 (17.4)	4 (17.4)
9. There is a high probability that using this strategy may cause/result in more benefit than harm	16 (69.6)	2 (8.7)	5 (21.7)