Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Nov 23;5(2):352–357.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.10.006

TABLE IV.

Disease characteristics and comorbidities among different races in food allergy patients in study at both Rush University Medical Center and Cincinnati Children Hospital Medical Center

Race group White African American (AA) Hispanic

Percent of cases with asthma 35.3 58.6 27.7
 Odds ratios (95% CI)* ref 2.35 (1.63–3.40)
P = .000
0.82 (0.49–1.36)
P = .441
Percent of cases with allergic rhinitis 57.7 67.4 56.6
 Odds ratios (95% CI) ref 1.20 (0.83–1.75)
P = .331
0.89 (0.54–1.44)
P = .627
Percent of cases with eczema 35.1 56.5 56.1
 Odds ratios (95% CI) ref 1.80 (1.28–2.53)
P = .001
1.86 (1.17–2.95)
P = .009
Percent of cases with anaphylaxis to foods 16.4 33.9 35.4
 Odds ratios (95% CI) ref 2.36 (1.59–3.521)
P = .000
2.80 (1.70–4.64)
P = .000
Percent of cases with ED visit for food allergy 18.2 39.7 34.3
 Odds ratios (95% CI) ref 2.68 (1.93–3.93)
P = .000
2.14 (1.30–3.53)
P = .003
Age in years at first allergist visit (mean ± standard deviation) 4.28 ± 3.71 4.86 ± 3.83 4.04 ± 3.28
 Regression coefficients (95% CI) ref 0.14 (−0.15 to 0.44)
P = .333
0.02 (−0.37 to 0.42)
P = .908
Duration of follow-up (y) (mean ± standard deviation) 3.20 ± 2.12 2.32 ± 2.38 2.22 ± 2.25
 Regression coefficients (95% CI) ref −0.69 (−1.04 to −0.34)
P = .000
−0.72 (−1.19 to −0.25)
P = .003

CI, Confidence interval; ED, emergency department.

*

The reported odds ratios (95% CIs) were calculated in comparison with whites by logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, and insurance.

Regression coefficients for all numeric variables in different races were calculated in comparison with whites by linear regression adjusting for age, gender, and insurance.

Duration of follow-up was calculated by subtracting the age at the first visit from the age at the last visit.