TABLE 5.
Difference found between the predicted proximal tibial force from the booted to the unbooted configuration across a range of UBB loading represented by 25 combinations of target peak velocity and time to peak velocity.
| Combination | Time to peak velocity (ms) | Peak velocity (m/s) | % Difference in proximal tibia force |
| 1 | 1.5 | 5 | −12 |
| 2 | 3.5 | 5 | −19 |
| 3 | 5 | 5 | −12 |
| 4 | 7 | 5 | −14 |
| 5 | 9 | 5 | −14 |
| 6 | 1.5 | 11.25 | −24 |
| 7 | 3.5 | 11.25 | −22 |
| 8 | 5 | 11.25 | −21 |
| 9 | 7 | 11.25 | −23 |
| 10 | 9 | 11.25 | −22 |
| 11 | 1.5 | 17.5 | −22 |
| 12 | 3.5 | 17.5 | −22 |
| 13 | 5 | 17.5 | −23 |
| 14 | 7 | 17.5 | −21 |
| 15 | 9 | 17.5 | −25 |
| 16 | 1.5 | 23.75 | −22 |
| 17 | 3.5 | 23.75 | −21 |
| 18 | 5 | 23.75 | −24 |
| 19 | 7 | 23.75 | −19 |
| 20 | 9 | 23.75 | −18 |
| 21 | 1.5 | 30 | −15 |
| 22 | 3.5 | 30 | −19 |
| 23 | 5 | 30 | −19 |
| 24 | 7 | 30 | −17 |
| 25 | 9 | 30 | −18 |