Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 7;11:683419. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.683419

Table 3.

Strengths, weaknesses and recommendations for three predictive MSI-H/dMMR biomarkers for ICI response.

Assays Strengths Weaknesses Recommendations
IHC for dMMR
  • Simple

  • Fast

  • Cost-effective

  • Widely available

  • Too many variables

  • Hard to determine cut-off

  • Relatively low analytic sensitivity and accuracy

  • First choice in general

  • Use of all four antibodies

  • Use for colorectal cancer and other spectrum of Lynch syndrome when suitable

PCR for MSI-H
  • Widely available

  • Ease of use

  • Accurate for colorectal cancer and other spectrum of Lynch syndrome

  • Capture partial MSI profiles

  • Low prevalence in some tumor types

  • Use of five poly-A panel

  • Use after neoadjuvant therapy or in advanced tumors

NGS for MSI-H
  • Capture full MSI profile

  • Suitable for all tumor type

  • More accurate and sensitive

  • Simultaneous detection of other potential predictors

  • High cost

  • Technical demands

  • Lack of wide availability

  • Need tumor-type specific cut-off

  • The last choice

  • >300 genes in the panel

  • Standardize technical parameters wherever possible