Table III.

Quality appraisal

Author (year)	1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research?	2. Is a qualitative methodology appropriate?	3. Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research?	4. Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research?	5. Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue?	6. Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered?	7. Have ethical issues been taken into consideration?	8. Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous?	9. Is there a clear statement of findings?	10. How valuable is the research?*
Andrews et al. (2017)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	High
Edward and Evers (2001)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Moderate
Hu et al. (2013)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	High
Knapp et al. (2019)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Moderate
McFadden et al. (2014)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	High
Ohly et al. (2019)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	High
Palar et al. (2019)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	High
Pettigrew et al. (2017)	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Moderate
Savoie Roskos et al. (2017)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Moderate
Saxe-Custack et al. (2018)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Moderate
Tobey et al. (2019)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Moderate
White et al. (2018)	No	Yes	Can’t tell	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Moderate

*The reviewers subjectively decided whether the research was of low, moderate, or high value after discussing the contribution the study made to existing knowledge and whether the results of the study would help answer the research question(s).