Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 18;13:17562872211022870. doi: 10.1177/17562872211022870

Table 1.

Selection and classification (patient, disease and treatment parameters) of selected variables relevant for the second-line therapeutic choice and the relative ranking score and importance.

Patient-dependent parameters Ranking score Parameter importance
Symptomatology of the disease in the second line 12 1
Comorbidities (especially cardiovascular) and immuno-oncology (I-O) characteristic of the patient 13 2
Prognostic class: IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) risk score 23 3
Compliance and independent management of therapy and patient perception 24 4
Predictable need to use steroids in the short term 25 5
Patient motivation (respect the survival curve) and patient awareness of the therapy 29 6
Disease-dependent parameters Ranking score Parameter importance
Biological aggressiveness of the tumor e type of progression 14 1
Presence of the sarcomatoid component 20 2
Disease volume 23 3
Symptomatology of the disease in the second line 23 3
Prognostic class: IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) risk score 29 5
Predictable need to use steroids in the short term 34 6
Sites of metastases (in particular, presence of brain and liver metastases) 35 7
Histology 38 8
Treatment-dependent parameters Ranking score Parameter importance
Selection of the first line between TKI and immunotherapy 12 1
Objective of the second-line treatment 13 2
Onset of drug action 18 3
Duration of response to first-line therapy (TKI) 19 4
Toxicity of first-line treatment 22 5