Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 18;13:17562872211022870. doi: 10.1177/17562872211022870

Table 2.

The parameters considered relevant for the choice of second-line therapy and the category to which they belong.

Parameter
Number (#) Description Category (Therapy=T – Disease=D – Patient=P)
1 Duration of response to first-line therapy (TKI) T
2 Selection of the first line between TKI and immunotherapy T
3 Presence of nephrectomy in the patient T
4 Objective of the second-line treatment T
5 Onset of drug action T
6 Toxicity of first-line treatment T
7 Presence of a sarcomatoid component D
8 Biological aggressiveness of the tumor D
9 Prognostic class: IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) risk score D, P
10 Performance status of the patient P
11 Comorbidities (especially cardiovascular) P
12 Immuno-oncology (I-O) characteristic of the patient P
13 Compliance and autonomous management of therapy P
14 Patient preference P
15 Method of therapy administration (oral versus intravenous) T
16 Patient motivation P
17 Patient awareness of the therapy P
18 Disease volume D
19 Mechanism of action of the anticancer agent T
20 Site of metastases D
21 Presence of brain and liver metastases (bone excluded) D
22 Type of progression D
23 Symptomatology of the disease in the second line D, P
24 Predictable need to use steroids in the short term D, P
25 Histology D
26 Vascular architecture in the absence of necrosis D
27 Ratio of N/L (neutrophils/lymphocyte) D
28 Imaging necrosis (CT) D
29 MSI (state of instability of the microsatellites) D