Table 3.
Fellows' satisfaction with curriculum
| Item | Mean (SD) |
|---|---|
| Overall rating of curriculum | 4.1 (0.58) |
| Relevance of topic to nephrology training | 4.3 (0.60) |
| Usefulness of module 1—Why conservative care? | 4.2 (0.69) |
| Usefulness of module 2—Identify who benefits | 4.2 (0.65) |
| Usefulness of module 3—Learn what matters most | 4.2 (0.61) |
| Usefulness of module 4—Make a recommendation | 4.1 (0.69) |
| Usefulness of demonstration of REMAP communication skills with physician and patient | 4.2 (0.64) |
| Usefulness of the worksheet | 3.8 (0.92) |
| Usefulness of the prognosis exercise | 4.0 (0.87) |
| Usefulness of the recommendation exercise | 4.0 (0.86) |
| Ability to navigate the online curriculum website | 4.2 (0.63) |
| Flipped classroom REMAP practice | 4.0 (0.90) |
| Flipped classroom group review session | 4.1 (0.67) |
Ratings given as mean ± SD. Key: one, not at all; two, not very satisfied; three, somewhat satisfied; four, satisfied; five, very satisfied. Statistical significance P=0.05. REMAP framework: “R” is reframe why the status quo is not working, “E” is expect emotion and empathize, “M” is map the future, “A” is align with patient’s values, and “P” is plan treatments that match patient values.