Table 4. Comparison of short-outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection between our study and other published studies from different countries.

Author (Year)	Country	Study type	Number of lesions	Total			Absolute indication			Expanded indication
				En bloc resection	Complete resection	Curative resection	En bloc resection	Complete resection	Curative resection	En bloc resection	Complete resection	Curative resection
Our study	China	Single center	570	95.96	91.23	82.98	98.74	96.64	96.22	95.20	90.77	88.19
Ribeiro (2009) 4	Portugal	Single center	19	79
Emura (2015) 5	Colombia	Single center	54	98	93	83				98	93	83
Probst (2010) 6	Germany	Single center	191	92.1	75.9	63.9	98.4	90.2	90.2	89.0	73.6	73.6
Isomoto (2009) 22	Japan	Single center	589	94.9		94.7	96.4		97.0	92.3		90.4
Abe (2013) 23	Japan	Single center	113	99.0	90.7	63.9				99.0	90.7	63.9
Kosaka (2013) 24	Japan	Single center	570	97.7		83.1	98.0		96.0	89.7		72.0
Oda (2013) 25	Japan	Multicenter	3788	93.6
Tanabe (2013) 28	Japan	Single center	421		92.9
Goto (2009) 27	Japan	Single center	276	96.7	91.7		97.8	93.3		94.8	88.7
Hasuike (2017) 29	Japan	Multicenter	470	99.1		67.0				99.1		67.0
Chung (2009) 30	Korea	Multicenter	1000	95.3	90.1	87.7
Choi (2016) 31	Korea	Multicenter	737		97.3	86.8
Sohn (2017) 32	Korea	Single center	611	99.0		91.0	99.1		97.8	99.1		86.2
Probst (2010) 33	Germany	Single center	104	87.1	74.1		100	90.0		88.2	68.6
Pimentel (2014) 34	Portugal	Single center	141	94	91