Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 26;39(6):1717–1723. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03318-5

Table 3.

Intrarenal pressures characteristics and fluctuations

3a. IRP characteristics and profile
Mean basic IRP (± SD), cmH2O 13.19 (± 5.99)
Mean of the mean IRPs during the operations (± SD), cmH2O 15.38 (± 6.24)
N. of cases with peaks of IRP > 40.78 cmH2O (30 mmHg), n. (%) 19 (86)
N. of cases with mean IRP > 27.19 cmH2O (20 mmHg), n. (%) 0 (0)
Median accumulative time with IRP > 40.78 cmH2O (30 mmHg) (IQR), s 28.52 (12.5 – 60.04)
N. of cases with accumulative time (with IRP > 40.78 cmH2O) > 50 s, n. (%) 7 (31.8)
N. of cases with accumulative time (with IRP > 40.78 cmH2O) > 60 s, n. (%) 5 (22.7)
N. of cases with accumulative time (with IRP > 40.78 cmH2O) > 70 s, n. (%) 3 (13.6)
3b. Intrarenal pressure measurements step by step
Surgical steps Overall meana IRP
(± SD), cmH2O
Overall maxb IRP
(cmH2O)
Initial retrograde pyelography 36.14 (± 16.75) 65
Renal puncture 32.46 (± 12.49) 53,8
Percutaneous pyelography through puncture needle 37.26 (± 20.65) 102
Percutaneous tract dilation 39.10 (± 18.19) 74
Initial nephroscopy with closed aspiration, max IRP 39.03 (± 24.09) 94
Lithotripsy and simultaneous vacuum-lapaxy, mean IRP 13.29 (± 6.55) 26.53
Lithotripsy and simultaneous vacuum-lapaxy, max IRP 28.37 (± 12.26) 58
Final nephroscopy with closed aspiration, max IRP 51.15 (± 11.77) 70
Percutaneous pyelography through access sheath 53.44 (± 26.77) 115
Flexible nephroscopy after lithotripsy, max IRP 19.88 (± 8.00) 31
Nephrostomy placement 25.02 (± 15.37) 64
Final pyelography through nephrostomy tube 32.07 (± 21.24) 89

aIntended as the mean of the values of the single procedures for the specific surgical step

bIntended as the maximum value reached among the different procedures for the specific surgical step