Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;47(6):577–587. doi: 10.1007/s10886-021-01278-7

Table 3.

Analysis of total cg concentration (anova) and cg profile (permanova) of captive-reared individuals as a function of heliconiini species, sex and age

Tested factors Statistical results
Heliconiini Total [CGs] Profile of [CGs]
Species F254 = 4.469, P = 0.016* F254 = 6.374, P = 0.002*
Sex F154 = 20.080, P < 0.001* F154 = 18.364, P < 0.001*
Age F154 = 2.463, P = 0.122 F154 = 0.822, P = 0.366
Species: Sex F254 = 28.183, P < 0.001* F254 = 18.872, P < 0.001*
Species: Age F254 = 1.972, P = 0.149 F254 = 1.439, P = 0.245
Species: Sex: Age F254 = 0.472, P = 0.626 F254 = 0.482, P = 0.644

Total individual numbers: n 66; D. juno n 20, H. doris n 22 and H. numata n 24. * indicates significant differences (P < 0.001)