Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2021 Mar 19;116(1):208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.007

Table 3:

Multivariable Adjusted Associations of Hormonal Contraceptive Type with AMH Among Current Users Compared to Never Users

N AMH, ng/mL Median (IQR) Estimate of % change in AMH (95% CI)
Never use 232 4.71 (2.92, 7.19) Reference
COC 180 3.54 (2.01, 5.97) −24.0% (−36.6%, −8.9%)
Ring 28 1.89 (1.38, 3.91) −64.8% (−75.4%, −49.6%)
DMPA 103 3.23 (1.92, 5.72) −26.7% (−41.0%, −8.9%)
LNG-IUD 116 3.89 (2.46, 6.15) −8.7% (−25.7%, 12.2%)

COC=combined oral contraceptives, DMPA=depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, LNG-IUD=levonorgestrel IUD The multivariable model adjusted for age, age2, BMI, and reported histories of PCOS, abnormal menstrual bleeding, thyroid condition, and seeking care for difficulty conceiving