Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2021 May 15;123:110536. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110536

Table 1.

Anteroposterior translations of the articular contact (AC) points and femoral condyles at different ranges of knee flexion (“+” = anterior; “−” = posterior)

0 – 30° 30 – 60° 60 – 90° 90 – 120° Overall (Max - Min)
M L M L M L M L M L
AC −4.6±4.7a −5.1±4.1ab −2.8±2.4b −1.5±2.1b −0.4±1.7c −1.5±1.3b −1.4±2.3b −1.5±3.1a 10.7±4.6b 10.5±4.0a
TEA −1.0±2.1b −6.8±3.6a −5.0±1.8a −5.4±2.2a −5.1±2.7a −5.5±2.0a −4.1±3.3a −4.3±3.7a 16.0±5.2c 22.4±4.4c
GCA 4.5±2.5c −3.6±3.7b 0.8±1.9c −1.6±2.3b −0.3±1.6c −2.1±2.1b −1.8±2.2b −2.3±3.3a 7.3±2.1a 10.8±3.3a
IHA 3.6±2.5c −3.5±3.7b −0.8±1.9c −2.0±2.4b −2.4±1.7b −2.8±2.1b −3.5±2.4ab −3.2±3.4a 7.9±3.5a 12.4±3.2a

Note:

1.

Multiple comparisons (i.e., ANOVA + Tukey post hoc tests): for each column, each letter subscript represents a group within which there are no significant differences (p > 0.05); the subscripts in an alphabetical order were assigned to the groups with the means in an increasing order. Different subscripts mean significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).

2.

Student t-tests: the significant differences in the ROMs between the medial and lateral sides were indicated by bold.