Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Free Radic Biol Med. 2021 May 16;171:219–231. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.05.023

Table 2:

ETC Inhibitors

Inhibitor glu erastin RSL3 IAA
No treatment 7.8 ± 0.4% 14.1 ± 4.4% 12.1 ± 2.5% 7.2 ± 1.3%
Rotenone (1 μM) 79.2 ± 11.6%**** 70.7 ± 1.0%**** 0% 15.3 ± 1.6 %
TTFA (100 μM) 79.1 ± 6.6%**** 65.5 ± 25.3%*** 0% 30.2 ± 4.0%*
Antimycin A (1 μM) 67.9 ± 10.4%**** 73.2 ± 12.5%**** 0% 5.7 ± 9.8%
Myxothiazol (1 μM) 75.3 ± 4.9%**** 82.1 ± 2.3%**** 0% 0%
NaN3 (5 mM) 89.9 ± 1.2%**** 85.2 ± 4.3%**** 0% 10.7 ± 9.5%
FCCP (0.5 μM) 63.3 ± 6.2%**** 72.6 ± 2.6%**** 0% 44.3 ± 17.7%***

ETC inhibitors were tested for their ability to protect mouse HT22 hippocampal cells against glutamate, erastin and RSL3 toxicity at doses that induce 85%-95% cell death. Initially, a range of ETC inhibitor concentrations was tested based on literature reports. The most effective concentrations are reported here. The values presented are the average of a minimum of three independent experiments with all treatments done in triplicate.

*

p<0.05;

***

p<0.001;

****

p<0.0001 versus glutamate, erastin or RSL3 alone.