Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;9:682743. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.682743

TABLE 2.

Techniques and their analytical strengths and weaknesses in the context of analysing CDSA structures and intermediates.

Technique Sample type Strength Weakness
NMR Liquid, solid Can measure intermolecular environments Relies on presence of spin active nuclei
Can be applied dynamically Overlapping signals present assignment challenges
Certain methods, e.g NOESY, can provide intermolecular structural information Difficulties with radicals
DOSY NMR Liquid, solution Excellent for determining size of molecules within mixtures. Relies on presence of spin active nuclei
Can be layered over other NMR experiments. Can struggle with larger molecules that diffuse slowly Can be affected by exchange processes
DLS Solution or suspension Can accurately measure the size and shape of macromolecules and supramolecules Struggles to discern structurally similar molecules (monomers, dimers)
Can study interactions between analytes Structures formed in short timescale obscured by larger ones
TEM Ultrathin solid Allows direct structural characterisation Samples must be “electron transparent”
Sample preparation can be challenging
Not dynamic
TGA Solid or liquid Can give insight into the thermodynamic driving forces of self- assembly Structural information obtained is limited
UV-Vis spectroscopy Solution Effective for measuring transition elements and conjugated organic molecules Limited available structural information
Characteristic absorbances reveal (supra)molecular changes All molecules in solution can give signal, leading to overlapping signals
Fast measurement allows dynamic measurements and reaction monitoring Target species must be spectroscopically active
ITC Solution Quantitative measure of binding affinities and thermodynamics Measures equilibrium conditions, not suited to non-equilibrium systems
Cannot distinguish individual components from less specific contributions of bulk solution
X-ray Crystallography Crystalline solid Can obtain full structure, including isomerism Dependant on successful crystallisation
Self-assembled structures can be preserved in crystal Does not capture dynamic process
Information about bonding
ESI-MS or MALDI-MS Solid, liquid, gas Empirical formulas and charge states easily distinguished Target species must be ionisable/carry a charge
Structural information through MSn Artifacts due to ionisation process
Time scale dynamic range (milliseconds – hours) allows for dynamics and reaction monitoring Cannot decern all isomers
Dynamic range of masses allows simultaneous monitoring of reactant and product Isobaric interferences
Fragile species can be detected
Can be automated, high throughput
IMS Solid, liquid, gas In addition to advantages for MS, can filter isomers and isobars Target species must be ionisable/carry a charge
Structural identification via collisional cross section (Ω or CCS) Fragile species can be fragmented