Table 2.
Mixed-model ANOVA results for the best model (AICcmin; bolded) with radius (mm) as response variable.
| Factor Type | Factor/Level | AICcW | N models | Estimate | SE | Statistic | DF | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed | Intercept | – | – | 458.31 | 36.27 | – | – | – | |
| Fly type | 0.05 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Sex (Male/Female) | 0.22 | 4 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Age (Days) | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Temperature (°C) | 0.40 | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Humidity (%) | 0.28 | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Light (Log10 lux) | 1.00 | 12 | 12.75 | 4.33 | 8.68 | 1, 878.6 | 3.3 × 10–3 | ||
| Fly type:Sex | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Fly type:Age | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Fly type:Temperature | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Fly type:Humidity | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Fly type:Light | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Sex:Age | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Sex:Temperature | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Sex:Humidity | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Sex:Light | 0.04 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Age:Temperature | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Age:Humidity | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Age:Light | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Temperature:Humidity | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Temperature:Light | 0.13 | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Humidity:Light | 0.04 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Random | Day (Variance) | – | – | 3366 | 58.02 | 43.66 | 1 | 3.9 × 10–11 | |
The sum of weights for the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICcW) and N models (total = 12) with AICcΔ < 4 for each factor are summarized here. The significance of fixed factors was assessed using F-statistic in a type III ANOVA with Satterthwaite’s method. The random factor was assessed using log-likelihood ratio with significance analyzed using a chi-square distribution.