Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;68:103433. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103433

Table 5.

Comparison among Association Models on Cross-sectional Hypertension using MESA Participants.

Association model Sample Size Case Number OR per SD* 95% CI p-value AUC NRI
AHI 2015 1365 1.22 [1.05, 1.42] 0.009 0.75 \
cSPPSG 923 615 1.26 [1.10, 1.45] 0.001 0.77 0.04
cSPHST 1242 820 1.26 [1.12, 1.42] <0.001 0.77 0.03
cSPPSG, no lung function 1255 841 1.10 [0.99, 1.21] 0.072 0.75 0.04
cSPHST, no lung function 1697 1126 1.08 [1.00, 1.17] 0.042 0.75 0.01
FVCpp 3079 2147 0.80 [0.74, 0.87] <0.001 0.75 0.04
FEV1pp 3074 2142 0.83 [0.77, 0.90] <0.001 0.74 0.01

The number of participants varies across models due to missing data patterns. Case number is the number of individuals with hypertension in the specific association model.

1 All NRIs are calculated in regard to AHI model

2 The cut-off probability for categorizing hypertension is determined when Youden index is maximized

3 All prediction models adjust for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, waist/hip ratio, smoking status and packet year

4 SD here all calculated from corresponding phenotype in SHHS.