Table 2.
Limitation | Reason | Solution | References |
---|---|---|---|
Poor quality of images | Small pupil | Mydriasis | [9, 20, 36, 77] |
Poor transparency of optic media | Cataract extraction | [8, 9, 16, 18, 20, 75, 77, 79–82] | |
Screening program organizational problems | Need for trained photographers, graders and retina specialists |
Training of technicians, nurses and general practitioners In-home testing with self-preliminary images reading AI grading |
[7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 20, 22, 26–29, 33, 37–40, 42, 43, 45, 47–52, 55, 58, 59, 63, 65–68, 74–76, 76, 80–82] |
High cost of screening | Expensive screening devices and software, crew costs |
Mobile screening sets Cheap portable cameras Smartphone screening Telescreening AI-assisted screening |
[9, 12, 23, 27, 33, 41, 43, 47, 58, 60, 64, 65, 67, 68, 73, 77, 81, 86] |
Poor sensitivity of DR detection | 1-, 2- or 3-field images- with too small coverage of retina | Ultra-wide fundus cameras use | [8, 9, 11, 15, 22, 23, 30, 33, 36, 39–42, 44, 46, 47, 49, 51, 57, 60, 61, 64–70, 75–77, 81, 82] |
Low percentage of follow-up | Social and educational factors | Basic diabetic education | [19, 21, 23, 24, 34, 51, 86, 87, 89] |
No positive results of telescreening | Small widespread in population | Diabetic education | [10, 11] |
Need for co-pay | Better social insurance | ||
The more advanced the diagnosis, the more expensive | Expensive and complex screening schemes | Common use of AI | [39] |
Long waiting time for final diagnosis | Insufficient screening system | AI grading | [9, 33, 38, 55, 68, 81] |
Lack of an integrated virtual platform for DR screening | Lack of proper software | Development of screening software | [70] |