TABLE 1.
The SWOT analysis of using scaffolds based on RNA-gene therapy.
Strengths | Weakness |
---|---|
• Easily to introduce into cells with high efficiency. | • Cells might not be transfectable. |
• Can be rapidly produced in the laboratory. | • Non-renewable resource. |
• Virus-mediated toxic effects. | |
• Cost efficient. | • The uncertainty of the scaffold degradation rate may affect the efficacy of the RNAs. |
• Chemical modification can be used to reduce the off-target effect. | |
• May have a long-time effect. | • RNAs release limitation due to the strong interaction between scaffolds and the vectors. |
• Scaffolds can protect RNA complexes from endogenous RNases. | |
• The local RNA delivery into the site of interest may use to avoid unwanted release in other sites. | • Regulation policies may cause a delay to get clinical trials approvals. |
Opportunities | Threats |
• A new sector in the market to access that provides long-term revenue. | • Long-time follow-up is required to ensure the safety and efficacy of therapy. |
• A collaboration between the digital market based on artificial intelligence (AI) and the currently available data may accelerate RNA treatment development. | • Pre- or post-immune reactivity may limit the clinical trials. |
• Merge the field of personalized medicine and the gene therapy which targets the oligonucleotide of an individual’s genotype may become applicable for gene silencing and directing the gene-editing case. | • More studies are necessary to find the optimal RNA sequence to use for treatment. |
• Biosimilar competition will need to demonstrate the efficacy of new therapy comparing to the traditional therapies. | |
• Significant investments are required to cover all the expenses needed for RNA-based therapy manufacturing. |