Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 22;15(3):381–391. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0086

Table 1.

Article information

Author (year) Study design Sample size Mean age (yr) Male:female Mode of treatment Mean follow-up (mo) Main variables Functional outcome assessment Results
Singh et al. [2] (2017) Retrospective 60 49.7 26:34 Surgery: posterior transpedicular approach 12 AIS; pain ODI Significant ODI improvement (p<0.05)
Sun et al. [7] (2013) Prospective 14 34.3 5:9 Surgical: one-stage posterior approach 39.3 Frankel; pain; kyphotic angle ODI Significant ODI improvement (p<0.001)
Gao et al. [10] (2017) Prospective 58 41 29:29 Surgery: titanium mesh vs. autogenous iliac bone graft 35.5 Frankel; kyphotic angle; intervertebral height; ESR and CRP ODI No significant difference in ODI between two surgical approaches (p=0.728)
Ran et al. [8] (2016) Retrospective 24 50.8 15:9 Surgery: one-stage posterior approach and combined interbody and posterior fusion 19 AIS; pain; kyphotic angle; ESR ODI Significant ODI improvement (p<0.05)
Omran and Abdel-Fattah [9] (2019) Retrospective 35 37.5 20:15 Surgery: posterior extensive circumferential decompressive reconstructive technique 36 AIS; pain; kyphotic angle; estimated blood loss; fusion time ODI Significant ODI improvement (p<0.001)
Zhu et al. [29] (2017) Retrospective 17 30.5 8:9 Surgery: posterior open-window focal debridement and joint fusion 36 Pain; Kim’s classification; ESR ODI Significant ODI improvement (p<0.001)
Xing et al. [11] (2016) Retrospective 11 40.4 7:4 Surgery: anterior cervical retropharyngeal debridement combined with occipital cervical fusion 39.2 Pain; JOA; blood loss; operation time JOA Significant JOA improvement (p<0.05)
Liu et al. [12] (2012) Retrospective 12 30 7:5 Surgery: anterior debridement, corpectomy and fixation with iliac crest grafts or titanium cage 25.17 Pain; kyphotic angle; blood loss; operation time; postop hospital stay JOA Significant JOA improvement after surgery via this method (p<0.05)
Li et al. [23] (2017) Retrospective 23 49 12:11 Surgery: posterior intervertebral space debridement, annular bone grafting and instrumentation 34.2 AIS; pain; kyphotic angle; ESR and CRP; blood loss; operation time SF-36 All domains of SF-36 showed significant improvement (p<0.05)
Li et al. [13] (2019) Retrospective 42 69.09 22:20 Surgery: posterior versus anterior approach 23.21 AIS; pain; kyphotic angle; ESR and CRP; albumin levels; complications ODI No significant difference in ODI between two surgical approaches (p=0.15)
Wu et al. [14] (2018) Retrospective 394 35.18 208:186 Surgery: posterior fixation vs anterior fixation 37 AIS; pain; kyphotic angle; ESR ODI Significant ODI improvement after surgery via both methods. (p<0.05) while there is no significant difference between the two methods.
Omran et al. [25] (2017) Retrospective 45 32.5 20:25 Surgery: lateral extracavitary approach vs. posterior extensive circumferential decompression 36 AIS; pain; kyphotic angle; blood loss; operation time; postop hospital stay ODI Significant improvement in ODI scores after surgery via both methods (p<0.001) but no significant difference between two surgical approaches
Kandwal et al. [15] (2012) Prospective 23 38.2 22:16 Surgery: minimally invasive surgery via VATS 36 Frankel; Eck and Bridwell criteria ODI Significant ODI improvement (p<0.05)
Bhandari et al. [16] (2014) Prospective 38 32.8 15:23 Conservative 18 Clinical characteristic (including motor and sensory deficits, bladder involvement, spasticity) MBI Significant improvement of MBI scores in patients with following characteristics: (1) duration of symptoms <3 months (p=0.001); (2) minor motor deficits (p=0.02); (3) no bladder involvement (p=0.01); (4) no flexor spasms (p=0.01); (5) no spinal cord compression (p=0.003); (6) no spinal extension (p=0.003)
Garg et al. [17] (2013) Prospective 70 40.77 40:30 Conservative 6 Modified Rankin Scale; clinical characteristics; neuroimaging results (i.e., kyphotic angle, vertebral height, disc space, etc.); histopathological picture MBI Significant worsening of MBI scores in patients with: (1) illness duration >6 months; (2) bladder involvement; (3) spinal deformity; (4) abnormal tone; (5) lower limb muscle power <4; (6) thoracic spine involvement; (7) more than two vertebral segments involvement; (8) spasticity; (9) vertebral collapse; (10) cord compression; (11) abscess; (12) MBI <12 at admission (all p-values <0.001)
Shetty et al. [18] (2019) Retrospective 63 45.9 35:28 Conservative vs. surgery 43.1 Frankel; pain; ESR and CRP; vertebral height loss; global lumbar lordosis; bone healing time ODI Significant negative correlation between lumbar lordosis and ODI score (r=-0.867, p<0.001)
Qu et al. [19] (2015) Retrospective 115 47 68:47 Conservative vs. surgery 14.4 Pain; Kaplan-Meier curves of the neurologic recovery JOA No significant difference in JOA improvement between conservative and surgical management in uncomplicated cases (p=0.14)
Toulgui et al. [21] (2016) Retrospective 24 46.7 Inpatient rehabilitation 24 Impairment type; muscle strength recovery; bladder and sphincter disorder FIM Significant FIM improvement after postoperative inpatient rehabilitation (p<0.05)
Zaoui et al. [20] (2012) Retrospective 9 43.8 5:4 Inpatient rehabilitation 47 days AIS; neuroimaging results; histopathological picture FIM Significant FIM improvement after inpatient rehabilitation (p<0.05)

AIS, American Society of Spinal Cord Injury Impairment Scale; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein levels; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score; SF-36, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey; VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; MBI, modified Barthel Index; FIM, Functional Independence Measure.