Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;35(6):722–728. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202012114

表 3.

Comparison of AOFAS ankle and hindfoot score of different Haraguchi classification groups at last follow-up ( Inline graphic)

各分型组末次随访时 AOFAS 踝与后足评分比较( Inline graphic

组别
Group
例数
n
总分
Total
疼痛
Pain
日常生活质量
Quality of daily life
关节活动度
Joint range of motion
关节稳定性
Joint stability
*与Ⅰ型组比较 P<0.05,#与Ⅲ型组比较 P<0.05
*Compared with typeⅠgroup, P<0.05;#compared with type Ⅲ group, P<0.05
Ⅰ型
TypeⅠ
38 92.4±4.0 38.0±1.5 24.5±1.2 13.4±0.5 16.5±1.2
Ⅱ型
TypeⅡ
30 89.7±4.3*# 36.7±1.4*# 23.5±1.8 13.5±0.5 15.9±1.5
Ⅲ型
Type Ⅲ
18 92.1±3.6 37.9±1.4 24.4±1.1 13.5±0.5 16.3±1.0
统计值
Statistic
F=4.103
P=0.036
F=7.775
P=0.002
F=4.215
P=0.079
F=0.437
P=0.642
F=1.725
P=0.208