Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Jan 6;65(3):283–295. doi: 10.1111/jir.12810

Table 5.

Study 2: comparison of ABAS-2 and ABAS-3 standardised scores; mean (SD) (n = 572)

ABAS-2 ABAS-3 t value P value Cohen’s d 95% CI
[lower, upper]
CCC, 95% CI
[lower, upper]
GAC (SS) 72.87 (17.20) 79.56 (13.37) 12.75 <0.001 0.37 [5.66, 7.72] 0.61 [0.57, 0.66]
Conceptual (SS) 76.57 (15.66) 79.84 (12.77) 7.03 <0.001 0.20 [2.36, 4.18] 0.68 [0.64, 0.72]
Social (SS) 81.68 (17.22) 83.37 (14.59) 2.98   0.003 0.11 [0.57, 2.80] 0.64 [0.59, 0.68]
Practical (SS) 72.29 (19.10) 80.89 (13.92) 9.82 <0.001 0.47 [7.38, 9.82] 0.54 [0.49, 0.58]

Note. ABAS, Adaptive Behavior Assessment System; GAC, general adaptive composite; SD, standard deviation; SS, standard score.

Degrees of freedom = 571 for all t tests.