Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Jan 6;65(3):283–295. doi: 10.1111/jir.12810

Table 7.

ABAS-2 versus ABAS-3 mean scaled/standard score differences and effect sizes for studies 1 and 2

Study 1 mean difference (n = 2327) Study 1 effect sizes (d) Study 2 mean difference (n = 572) Study 2 effect sizes (d)
GAC 5.37 0.37 6.69 0.43
Conceptual 2.69 0.20 3.27 0.23
Communication 0.47 0.16 0.66 0.21
Functional academics 0.62 0.22 0.59 0.19
Self-direction 1.48 0.51 1.52 0.52
Social 0.67 0.04 1.69 0.11
Leisure ‒0.28 0.09 ‒0.27 0.08
Social 0.89 0.26 0.81 0.23
Practical 7.22 0.47 8.60 0.51
Community use 1.86 0.60 1.64 0.50
Home living 2.16 0.69 2.24 0.76
Health and safety 0.06 0.02 0.42 0.13
Self-care 1.56 0.51 1.89 0.62

Note. Composites are presented as standard scores (M = 100, SD = 15), subscales are presented as scaled scores (M = 10, SD = 3); mean difference = ABAS-3 — ABAS-2.

ABAS, Adaptive Behavior Assessment System.