Table 4.
City A | City B | |
---|---|---|
Odds Ratio | ||
Reached minimum recommended number of prenatal care visits | 0.990 | 0.781*** |
[0.950, 1.032] | [0.740, 0.825] | |
N | 54,724 | 25,842 |
Delivery at tertiary hospital | 0.734*** | 0.336*** |
[0.701, 0.769] | [0.319, 0.354] | |
N | 54,729 | 25,839 |
Delivery via Cesarean section | 1.065*** | 1.127*** |
[1.027, 1.104] | [1.069, 1.189] | |
N | 54,729 | 25,844 |
Coef | ||
Total medical cost | ||
Cesarean section | -0.040*** | -0.094*** |
[-0.046, -0.033] | [-0.120, -0.068] | |
R-squared | 0.09 | 0.01 |
N | 21,269 | 10,159 |
Natural delivery | -0.078*** | -0.199*** |
[-0.085, -0.071] | [-0.221, -0.177] | |
R-squared | 0.13 | 0.03 |
N | 33,464 | 15,690 |
Note. We used logistic models to analyze whether Cesarean section was conducted and whether the delivery took place at a tertiary hospital. We used an ordinary least squares model to analyze outcomes on the log of total medical spending. For all of the regressions, we included maternal age and year and month dummies as control variables. We used urban mothers as the reference group. 95% confidence intervals are shown in brackets.
*p < .1, **p < .05, *** p < .001