Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2020 Sep 7;32(12):1118–1132. doi: 10.1037/pas0000953

Table 1.

Summary of standardized factor loadings from group-based scoring models

Full sample
N = 1015
Low performing
N = 517
High performing
N = 498
Factor Loading (β) Mean SD Min Max Mean SD Min Max Mean SD Min Max
Flowers
EF by Accuracy .66 .09 .50 .81 .63 .13 .40 .84 .20 .17 −.11 .44
EF by RT −.40 .06 −.51 −.33 −.34 .12 −.56 −.19 −.43 .07 −.53 −.31
SPEED by RT (F) .50 .06 .35 .58 .51 .07 .40 .61 .50 .07 .29 .56
SPEED by RT (H) .70 .06 .58 .76 .70 .06 .57 .75 .71 .06 .60 .77
Mixed
EF by Accuracy .39 .14 .02 .60 .55 .42 −.35 1.23 .07 .17 −.35 .38
EF by RT .47 .08 .34 .66 .23 .05 .14 .35 −.46 .05 −.57 −.34
SPEED by RT (X) .50 .04 .42 .58 .18 .03 .12 .24 .37 .04 .29 .45
SPEED by RT (H) .69 .06 .57 .76 .25 .02 .22 .28 .71 .06 .60 .76

Note. F = flowers; H = hearts; X = mixed; RT = reaction time.