Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2020 Sep 7;32(12):1118–1132. doi: 10.1037/pas0000953

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations among enhanced and traditional scores in full sample

Score 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. EF Ability (F) -
2. % Correct (F) .80*** -
3. ΔRT (F) −.78*** −.20*** -
4. EF Ability (X) .25*** .52*** .24*** -
5. % Correct (X) .48*** .57*** −.14*** .73*** -
6. ΔRT (X) −.09** .25*** .52*** .83*** .26*** -
M 0.00 0.87 243.8 0.00 0.80 543.1
SD 0.90 0.21 199.6 0.95 0.18 226.1

Note. Sample sizes for correlations range from 911 to 1015. F = flowers; X = mixed; RT = reaction time.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001