Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2020 Sep 7;32(12):1118–1132. doi: 10.1037/pas0000953

Table 4.

Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations among enhanced and traditional scores by performance group

Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 M SD
1. EF Ability (F) - .34*** −.94*** .56*** −.03 −.56*** 0.00 0.87
2. % Correct (F) .87*** - −.24*** .11* −.05 −.11* 0.96 0.06
3. ΔRT (F) −.66*** −.11* - −.54*** .01 .58*** 210.9 155.0
4. EF Ability (X) .34*** .51*** .30*** - .17*** −.96*** 0.00 0.94
5. % Correct (X) .34*** .40*** −.02 .72*** - −.14** 0.93 0.04
6. ΔRT (X) .13** .36*** .48*** .91*** .54*** - 543.5 176.3
M 0.00 0.77 280.1 0.00 0.67 542.7
SD 0.91 0.26 234.3 0.96 0.16 269.5

Note. Values above the diagonal represent statistics in the high-performing group, whereas values below the diagonal represent statistics in the low-performing group. Sample sizes for correlations range from 419 to 517 in the low-performing group, and from 492 to 498 in the high-performing group. F = flowers; X = mixed; RT = reaction time.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001