Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 17;65(7):e02587-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02587-20

TABLE 1.

Impact of BMD assay modifications and supplements on exebacase MICs against 25 S. aureus isolatesa

Supplementation/modification MIC (μg/ml)
Trailing effect
50% 90% Range
None 32 64 2–128 Yes
0.002% polysorbate 80 64 64 8–64 Yes
50 μg/ml Ca2+ 32 64 1–128 Yes
2% NaCl 128 128 32–128 Yes
2.5% laked horse blood 32 64 4–256 Yes
5% laked horse blood 32 64 4–256 Yes
10% laked horse blood 16 32 2–128 Yes
25% laked horse blood 8 16 2–128 Yes
Polypropylene plates 16 128 4–128 Yes
0.1% BSA (polypropylene plates) 8 32 1–32 Yes
0.1% BSA 8 32 4–32 Yes
0.1% BSA, 2% NaCl, 200 rpm 32 128 8–>256 Yes
0.1% BSA, 2% NaCl 32 64 16–128 Yes
CO2 atmosphere 32 64 32–128 Yes
0.5 mM DTT 128 128 8–256 Yes
50% horse serum 0.5 2 0.125–2 No
25% horse serum 0.5 2 0.125–2 No
12.5% horse serum 1 4 0.125–4 No
6.25% horse serum 4 8 1–8 No
a

MICs were determined by broth microdilution in 96-well, round-bottom, polystyrene microtitration plates (unless otherwise indicated) according to the method described in CLSI document M07-A11 (9), with the indicated supplements and modifications.