Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: React Chem Eng. 2019 Dec 13;5(2):320–329. doi: 10.1039/c9re00354a

Table 1.

Comparison of microscale [18F]FDOPA synthesis performance using manual and automated approaches. All values are averages ± standard deviations for the indicated number of replicates. All percentages are decay-corrected unless otherwise indicated. N.M. indicates the quantity was not measured.

Manual synthesis (n=3) Automated synthesis-low starting activity (n=4) Automated synthesis-higher starting activity (n=3)
Starting activity (MBq) 4.4 ~ 12 13 ~ 23 350 ~ 380
Synthesis time including purification (min) ~33 ~30 ~31
[18F]FDOPA conversion (%) 95.6 ± 0.4 78 ± 4 54.9 ± 1.9
Crude RCY (%) 20.5 ± 3.5 15.2 ± 2.1 5.2 ± 0.7
Isolated RCY (%) 15.1 ± 1.6 10.3 ± 1.4 4.7 ± 1.0
Isolated RCY (%, non-corrected) 12.3 ± 1.3 8.5 ± 1.2 3.9 ± 1.8
Enantiomeric purity (%) 98.0 ± 0.2 N.M. N.M.
Total activity loss during synthesis (%) 50 ± 5 78 ± 2 85 ± 2
Unrecoverable activity on cover chip (%) 24.7 ± 0.3 cover not used cover not used
Unrecoverable activity on bottom chip (%) 2.1 ± 0.4 2.9 ± 0.2 5.9 ± 2.9
Radioactivity recovery (%) 21 ± 4 20 ± 2 10 ± 2