Table 3.
Mean (CI 95%) | OLS model | Num | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Campaign | Outcome | Period | County treatment | Treatment | Control | Treatment (CI 95%) | p-value | RI p-value |
Both campaigns | Asinh(Fortnightly Cases) | Dec/Jan 1–14 | All | |||||
Low Intensity | ||||||||
High Intensity | ||||||||
Thanksgiving | Asinh(Fortnightly Cases) | Dec 1–14 | ||||||
Low Intensity | ||||||||
High Intensity | ||||||||
Christmas | Asinh(Fortnightly Cases) | Jan 1–14 | All | |||||
Low Intensity | ||||||||
High Intensity | 4.346 (4.280,4.412) | 4.396 (4.281,4.510) | −0.036 (−0.080,0.008) | 0.108 | 0.111 |
This table provides the control and treatment means at the zip code level, in addition to the estimate of the treatment coefficient in equation (2). The outcome is the inverse hyperbolic sine of the fortnightly cases, during a period which starts five to seven days after the event (Thanksgiving or Christmas). 95% CI are reported in parentheses. Standard errors are clustered at the zip level.