Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2020 Jan 22;22(12):6492–6506. doi: 10.1039/c9cp05912a

Table 3.

Comparing sequencing technologies.

Advantages Disadvantages Library amplification Sequencing technology
Illumina Inc. Large user base platform Low cost per base High coverage (high output) Short reads Bridge-PCR on flow cell surface Reversible terminator sequencing by synthesis
Pacific Biosciences Inc Very long reads (> 1 kb) Short run time Low reagents cost High basal error rate Low output NA Single-molecule, real-time DNA sequencing by synthesis
Life Technologies Corp. High coverage Longer reads Lower output PCR on FlowChip surface Polymerase synthesis
Sequencing by Oligo Ligation Detection Low cost per base Low reagents cost Inherent error correction (two-base encoding) Short reads Long run time Emulsion PCR Sequencing by ligation
Roche Inc. Longer reads Short run times High coverage Higher cost per base High reagents cost High error rates in homopolymer repeats Emulsion PCR on microbeads Pyrosequencing
Oxford Nanopore Very long reads Customization High error rate Difficult to design multiple parallel pores NA Nanopore exonuclease sequencing

Basic advantages and disadvantages of different sequencing platforms and the sequencing technology or chemistry they use. NA means not applicable.