Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 23;32(10):2841–2846. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04887-8

Table 2.

Survey sent to consultant urologists and gynaecologists regarding their preferences for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery before and after the “pause” on polypropylene in 2018

Question Answer
1. I am a: Urologist
Gynaecologist
2. I have been a consultant for: <5 years
5–10 years
>10 years
3. Prior to the “pause” on polypropylene mesh use for SUI, for a healthy female patient with uncomplicated SUI who has failed non-surgical treatment I would perform a: Multiple choice for each operation:
• Mid-urethral sling (never, rarely, sometimes, often, always)
• Autologous fascial sling (never, rarely, sometimes, often, always)
• Colposuspension (never, rarely, sometimes, often, always)
• Urethral bulking agent (never, rarely, sometimes, often, always)
4. Since the “pause” on polypropylene mesh use for SUI, for a healthy female patient with uncomplicated SUI who has failed non-surgical treatment I would perform a: Multiple choice for each operation:
• Mid-urethral sling (never, rarely, sometimes, often, always)
• Autologous fascial sling (never, rarely, sometimes, often, always)
• Colposuspension (never, rarely, sometimes, often, always)
• Urethral bulking agent (never, rarely, sometimes, often, always)