Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2502–2504. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6710

Table 2. Stratified IPTW-Adjusted Treatment Estimates for the Primary Outcome of Disability Days at 1 Year.

Factors No. of completers Disability days at 1 y, mean (95% CI) Difference (95% CI) P value for interactiona
Nonoperative management Surgery
Patient age, y
≤10 161 6.34 (4.9-8.19) 10.33 (8.26-12.39) −3.99 (−6.76 to −1.21) .82
>10 645 6.64 (5.42-7.86) 11.00 (9.91-12.09) −4.36 (−6.00 to −2.72)
Annual household income, $
<50 000 207 7.10 (5.46-8.74) 10.86 (9.09-12.64) −3.77 (−6.18 to −1.35) .99
≥50 000 504 5.84 (4.64-7.04) 9.60 (8.52-10.68) −3.76 (−5.37 to −2.15)
Transfer status
Not transferred 462 6.81 (5.59-8.03) 11.26 (9.88-12.63) −4.44 (−6.28 to −2.60) .81
Transferred 344 6.26 (4.48-8.03) 10.34 (9.04-11.64) −4.08 (−6.28 to −1.88)
Sexb
Male 506 6.44 (5.23-7.65) 10.64 (9.42-11.86) −4.20 (−5.92 to −2.48) .87
Female 300 6.81 (4.89-8.72) 11.26 (9.67-12.86) −4.46 (−6.95 to −1.96)
Race and ethnicityb,c
Non-Hispanic White 484 6.37 (4.89-7.86) 10.11 (9.04-11.17) −3.73 (−5.56 to −1.91) .34
Other race/ethnicity 322 6.87 (5.55-8.20) 12.01 (10.20-13.81) −5.14 (−7.38 to −2.89)
Insurance statusb
Private insurance 585 6.08 (4.99-7.27) 10.04 (9.06-11.02) −3.96 (−5.50 to −2.42) .38
Medicaid 198 7.89 (5.63-10.15) 13.55 (10.92-16.18) −5.66 (−9.13 to −2.20)
Primary caregiver educationb
Some college or less 341 6.12 (4.65-7.60) 11.12 (9.63-12.62) −5.00 (−7.10 to −2.90) .11
At least college degree 389 6.67 (5.10-8.24) 9.32 (8.10-10.54) −2.66 (−4.64 to −0.67)
Primary language spoken at homeb
English 676 6.51 (5.37-7.65) 10.20 (9.25-11.15) −3.69 (−5.17 to −2.20) .06
Other 92 6.01 (3.76-8.26) 14.44 (10.28-18.59) −8.42 (−13.15 to −3.70)
a

Interaction effects between treatment choice and the stratification factor were estimated through inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) linear regression models for disability days with differences between treatment groups estimated through marginal standardization. In all models, inference relied on robust sandwich-type standard errors to account for the estimated IPTWs.

b

Factor was added to the analysis post hoc.

c

Race and ethnicity were assessed because of evidence from the available literature suggesting an association with outcomes in pediatric patients treated for appendicitis. Related data were reported by caregivers using surveys with predefined categories listed in the table. Other includes Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, Alaska Native, and biracial patients. For patients managed nonoperatively with complete follow-up, this included 163 non-Hispanic White patients, 15 non-Hispanic Black patients, 19 Hispanic patients, 83 patients who reported another race or ethnicity, and 4 patients who did not report race or ethnicity. For patients in the surgery group with complete follow-up, this included 321 non-Hispanic White patients, 12 non-Hispanic Black patients, 46 Hispanic patients, 137 patients who reported another race or ethnicity, and 6 patients who did not report race or ethnicity.