Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 24;3(3):e619–e627. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.019

Table 3.

Percentage of Adherence to TIDieR Checklist Items by Prespecified Period and Overall

TIDieR Checklist Item Trials Published Between 2011 and 2013 (n = 73)
Trials Published Between 2016 and 2018 (n = 102)
Trials Published Between 2011 and 2018 (N = 175)
Adherence to Checklist Item, n (%) 95% CI Adherence to Checklist Item, n (%) 95% CI Adherence to Checklist Item, n (%) 95% CI
1. Brief name 73 (100) 1.000-1.000 102 (100) 1.000-1.000 175 (100) 1.000-1.000
2. Why/rationale? 73 (100) 1.000-1.000 102 (100) 1.000-1.000 175 (100) 1.000-1.000
3. What materials? 50 (68.5) 0.578-0.791 85 (83.3) 0.761-0.906 135 (77.1) 0.709-0.833
4. What procedures? 53 (72.6) 0.624-0.828 81 (79.4) 0.716-0.873 134 (76.6) 0.703-0.828
5. Who provided? 40 (54.8) 0.434-0.662 55 (53.9) 0.442-0.636 95 (54.3) 0.469-0.617
6. How? 68 (93.2) 0.874-0.989 100 (98.0) 0.953-1.007 168 (96) 0.931-0.989
7. Where? 46 (63) 0.519-0.741 72 (70.6) 0.617-0.794 118 (67.4) 0.605-0.744
8. When and how much (dose)? 68 (93.2) 0.874-0.990 100 (98.0) 0.953-1.007 168 (96) 0.931-0.989
9. Tailoring or personalization of intervention? 8 (10.9) 0.038-0.0.181 16 (15.7) 0.086-0.227 24 (13.7) 0.086-0.188
10. Modifications? 5 (6.8) 0.011-0.126 0 (0.0) 0.000-0.000 5 (2.9) 0.004-0.053
11. How well (planned) was intervention delivered? 5 (6.8) 0.011-0.126 10 (9.8) 0.040-0.156 15 (8.6) 0.044-0.127
12. To what extent (actual) was intervention delivered as planned? 3 (4.1) –0.004 to 0.087 11 (10.7) 0.047-0.168 14 (8.0) 0.040-0.120

CI, confidence interval; TIDieR, Template for Intervention Description and Replication.

Items were included in the calculation of the percentage of adherence if “completely” compliant with the TIDieR item.