Skip to main content
. 2021 May 5;3(3):e815–e822. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.12.013

Table 2.

Distribution of Response Variables

Questions Strongly Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly Agree
  • Q 1

    Is the angle of view appropriate for the evaluation of the femoral tunnel in the case of an anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction?

1 (2.5) 3 (7.5) 12 (30) 19 (47.5) 5 (12.5)
  • Q 2

    Is the angle of view appropriate for the evaluation of the femoral tunnel in this case where an anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction will be performed?

21 (52.5) 5 (12.5) 8 (20) 4 (10) 2 (5)
  • Q 3

    Is this angle of view appropriate for the examination of the patient who has been operated on suspicion of ACL rupture?

8 (20) 12 (30) 15 (37.5) 4 (10) 1 (2.5)
  • Q 4

    Is this angle of view suitable for evaluating whether the patient who has been operated on suspicion of ACL rupture is intact?

0 (0) 3 (7.5) 7 (17.5) 17 (42.5) 13 (32.5)
  • Q 5

    Is the angle of view appropriate for the arthroscopic examination performed to evaluate the suspicion of ACL rupture?

5 (12.5) 14 (35) 14 (35) 7 (17.5) 0 (0)
  • Q 6

    Is the angle of view suitable for the arthroscopic examination to evaluate suspicion of ACL rupture?

0 (0) 1 (2.5) 10 (25) 16 (40) 13 (32.5)
  • Q 7

    Is the angle of view suitable for the determination of the starting point of the femoral tunnel in the case where the anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction is planned?

20 (50) 11 (27.5) 5 (12.5) 4 (10) 0 (0)
  • Q 8

    Is the angle of view suitable for determining the starting point of the femoral tunnel in the patient who is planned to undergo anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction?

0 (0) 2 (5) 6 (15) 16 (40) 16 (40)

ACL, anterior ligament reconstruction.