Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;7(4):e110. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.64

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included randomised controlled trials

Age, years Intervention Comparison First-time users, Number who dropped out Duration RCT type Analysis Depression scale
Mean (s.d.) Formulation na Formulation na %b n (%) Number of cycles
Battaglia et al27 26.5 (2.4) Ethinylestradiol/drospirenone (30 μg/3 mg) 22 Ethinylestradiol/etonogestrel (15 μg/120 μg) 21 ? 3 (7.0) 6 Parallel, single blinded Complete cases BDI
Davis et al26 30.5 (7.4) Oestradiol/dienogest (3;2;2;1 mg/0;2;3;0 mg) 97 Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (30 μg/150 μg) 103 0.0 13 (6.1) 4 Parallel, double blinded Complete cases PGWBI Depression
Elaut et al19 23.1 (4.3) Ethinylestradiol/etonogestrel (15 μg/120 mg), desogestrel (75 μg) 55
55
Ethinylestradiol/desogestrel (20 μg/150 μg) 55 ? 40 (24.2) 3 Cross-over, unblinded Intention to treat SCL-90 Depression
Engman et al24 24.9 (4.2) Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (30 μg/150 μg) 14 Placebo 15 0.0 4 (11.4) 1 Parallel, double blinded Complete cases MADRS
Graham et al, sample a20 32.4 (3.7) Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (30 μg/150 μg), levonorgestrel (30 μg) 24
22
Placebo 25 1.3 4 (5.3) 3 Parallel, double blinded Complete cases BDI
Graham et al, sample b20 32.2 (4.2) Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (30 μg/150 μg), levonorgestrel (30 μg) 24
25
Placebo 25 33.0 1 (1.3) 3 Parallel, double blinded Complete cases BDI
Greco et al7 19.8 (1.8) Ethinylestradiol/norgestimate (35 μg/0.18;0.22;0.25 mg) 31 Ethinylestradiol/norgestimate (25 μg/0.18;0.22;0.25 mg) 29 ? 12 (20.0) 3 Parallel, single blinded Complete cases BDI
Kelly et al8 26.5 (6.1) Ethinylestradiol/drospirenone (30 μg/3 mg) 193 Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (30 μg/150 μg) 87 ? 144 (34.0) 6 Parallel, single blinded Complete cases MDQ Negative
Legro et al30 27.2 (5.1) Ethinylestradiol/norethindrone acetate (20 μg/1 mg continuous) 31 Ethinylestradiol/norethindrone acetate (20 μg/1 mg) 31 ? 11 (17.7) 6 Parallel, double blinded Intention to treat MDQ Negative
Lundin et al21 24.3 (4.2) Oestradiol/nomegestrol acetate (1.5 mg/2.5 mg) 80 Placebo 88 17.8 24 (11.9) 3 Parallel, double blinded Complete cases MADRS
O'Connell et al28 16.8 (2.1) Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (20 μg/100 μg) 34 Placebo 34 ? 8 (10.5) 3 Parallel, double blinded Complete cases CES-D
Sangthawan and Taneepanichskul9 26.8 (4.5) Ethinylestradiol/drospirenone (30 μg/3 mg) 50 Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (30 μg/150 μg) 49 ? 5 (4.8) 6 Parallel, unblinded Complete cases WHAQ Negative
Winkler et al23 28.3 (?) Ethinylestradiol/desogestrel (20 μg/150 μg) 404 Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (20 μg/100 μg) 384 7.6 239 (23.3) 6 Parallel, unblinded Complete cases PGWBI Depression
Witjes et al22 27.6 (7.0) Oestradiol/nomegestrol acetate (1.5 mg/2.5 mg) 2631 Ethinylestradiol/drospirenone (30 μg/3 mg) 891 ? ? 3 Parallel, unblinded Intention-to-treat MDQ
Zethraeus et al25 23.7 (3.6) Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (30 μg/150 μg) 162 Placebo 167 ? 11 (3.2) 3 Parallel, double blinded Complete cases BDI

RCT, randomised clinical trial; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; MADRS, Montgomery-Äsberg Depression Rating Scale; MDQ neg, Menstrual Distress Questionnaire negative affect subscale; PGWBI dep, Psychological General Well-Being Index depression subscale; SCL-90 dep, Symptom Checklist 90 depression subscale; WHAQ neg, Women's Health Assessment Questionnaire negative affect subscale. Ethinylestradiol/dienogest (3;2;2;1 mg/0;2;3;0 mg) is a multiphasic combined oral contraceptive that has four different dosages of hormones throughout a 4-week cycle. The dosages before the ‘slash’ refer to the different dosages of ethinylestradiol, and the ones after the ‘slash’ refer to those of dienogest. The study by Graham et al included two different samples, of which sample a was from the Philippines and sample b was from Scotland.

a.

Number of women who were available for the analysis (excluding those who dropped out) in case of complete-case analyses.

b.

Percentage of the baseline sample that had no experience with hormonal contraceptive use before participating in the trial. As the majority of studies ran complete-case analyses, it is unknown what percentage of women included in the meta-analyses had previous hormonal contraceptive experience.