Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2020 Sep 29;12264:470–479. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59719-1_46

Table 2.

Comparison of different deep learning-based models.

Models DSC [mean(std) %] ASD [mean(std) mm]
PB Bladder Rectum PB Bladder Rectum
U-Net 73.29(7.43) - - 2.79(1.27) - -
Multi-task U-Net 74.41(7.23) 87.84(10.04) 80.22(7.82) 2.58(1.21) 1.62(2.12) 2.50(1.85)
Cascaded U-Net 75.03(7.41) 87.93(8.95) 79.68(9.54) 2.54(1.23) 1.53(1.47) 2.78(2.97)
MTA-U-Net[7] 75.03(7.11) 88.46(8.08) 80.31(9.23) 2.51(1.13) 1.44(1.30) 2.56(2.91)
Proposed 75.67(6.56) 88.40(8.72) 80.35(9.36) 2.42(1.03) 1.47(1.22) 2.60(3.00)