Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;33(2):mzab091. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab091

Table 2.

Factors predicting the occurrence of glass particle contamination (n = 672)

Particle
Factors Occurrence
(n = 456)
n (%)
Non-occurrence
(n = 216)
n (%)
OR (95% CI) P
Method
Method 1 (n = 112) 84 (75.0) 28 (25.0) Reference
Method 2 (n = 112) 87 (77.7) 25 (22.3) 1.19 (0.61–2.35) 0.610
Method 3 (n = 112) 64 (57.1) 48 (42.9) 0.35 (0.18 − 0.67) 0.002
Method 4 (n = 112) 65 (58.0) 47 (42.0) 0.37 (0.20 − 0.71) 0.003
Method 5 (n = 112) 78 (69.6) 34 (30.4) 0.73 (0.38 − 1.40) 0.338
Method 6 (n = 112) 78 (69.6) 34 (30.4) 0.72 (0.37 − 1.39) 0.329
Ampoule size
2 ml (n = 336) 158(47.0) 178 (53.0) Reference
10 ml (n = 336) 298 (88.7) 38 (11.3) 9.53 (6.19 − 14.69) 0.000
Work experience, years
≤5 (n = 325) 235 (72.3) 90 (27.7) Reference
>5 (n = 347) 221 (63.7) 126 (36.3) 0.60 (0.41 − 0.88) 0.008
Breaking time; mean (SD) 16.67 (10.60) 13.38 (7.79) 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.535

Methods: Method 1 = gauze pad and outward direction, Method 2 = gauze pad and inward direction, Method 3 = cotton ball and outward direction, Method 4 = cotton ball and inward direction, Method 5 = syringe wrapper and outward direction and Method 6 = syringe wrapper and inward direction.

CI, confidence interval.