Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Crim Justice Behav. 2017 Mar 8;44(7):912–926. doi: 10.1177/0093854817695842

TABLE 4:

Final Model of Relationship With Lifetime Arrest History (n = 314)

Predictors β SE OR 95% CI
Step 1
 School 1 0.03 0.65 1.03 [0.29, 3.65]
 School 2 −0.32 0.66 0.73 [0.20, 2.69]
 School 3 0.07 0.62 1.08 [0.32, 3.66]
 School 4 −0.32 0.66 0.73 [0.20, 2.64]
Step 2
 Condition −0.21 0.37 0.81 [0.39, 1.66]
Step 3
 Female −0.45 0.36 0.64 [0.32, 1.29]
 Race/ethnicity 1.03* 0.48 2.80 [1.09, 7.20]
 Neighborhood Environment Scale 0.13 0.09 1.14 [0.95, 1.36]
 Marijuana use (lifetime) 1.39** 0.51 4.03 [1.48, 10.98]
 Alcohol use (lifetime) −0.16 0.42 0.85 [0.37, 1.96]
 Conduct disorder 0.35 0.44 1.43 [0.95, 1.36]
Step 4
 DER lack of emotional awareness 0.05 0.17 1.05 [0.75, 1.46]
 DER emotion regulation 0.11 0.21 1.12 [0.73, 1.70]
Step 5
 ERC parent report lability/negativity 0.34 0.42 1.40 [0.61, 3.22]
 ERC parent report emotion regulation 0.21 0.42 1.24 [0.54, 2.86]
Step 6
 ERC teacher report lability/negativity 0.38 0.30 1.46 [0.82, 2.58]
 ERC teacher report emotion regulation −1.02** 0.36 0.36 [0.18, 0.73]

Note. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; DER = Difficulties in Emotion Regulation; ERC = Emotion Regulation Checklist.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.