Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0253658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253658

Table 2. Meta-regression analysis for different parameters compared with composite reference standard.

Variables Subgroup No. of studies No. of specimens Sensitivity (95% CI) Meta regression p value Specificity (95% CI) Meta regression p value
TB type PTB 3 252 83% (64–100%) 0.56 99% (96–100%) 0.05
EPTB 9 929 68% (53–84%) 99% (98–100%)
Specimen type Plasma 8 986 73% (56–91%) 0.28 97% (94–99%) 0.05
Non-Plasma 6 717 60% (37–83%) 99% (98–100%)
Target gene IS6110 9 1001 72% (56–88%) 0.07 100% (99–100%) <0.01
Non-IS6110 2 326 32% (2–66%) 96% (78–100%)
PCR method Real-Time PCR 10 1069 63% (45–81%) 0.28 98% (96–100%) 0.36
Digital PCR 4 634 80% (56–100%) 97% (93–100%)
Study design Prospective 6 717 60% (37–83%) 0.28 99% (98–100%) 0.05
Case-control 8 986 73% (56–91%) 97% (94–99%)
Specimen condition Fresh 2 204 60% (20–100%) 0.66 100% (99–100%) 0.01
Frozen 12 1499 69% (53–84%) 97% (95–99%)
Patient selection method Convenience 6 464 83% (71–95%) 0.03 98% (96–100%) 0.14
Consecutive 8 1239 53% (37–69%) 97% (95–100%)

CI, confidence interval; TB, tuberculosis; PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; EPTB, extrapulmonary tuberculosis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.