Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 21;42(4):949–960. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000988

TABLE 3.

Multivariate linear regression on dependent outcome CVC50 in all participants with complete measurements (n = 120)

Independent Variable Coefficient 95% Confidence Interval p
1 Age at implantation −0.30 −0.67 0.07 0.11
2 Level of education (cat.)
<BSc Ref.
≥BSc 0.15 −10.04 10.28 0.98
3 Years of hearing loss −0.01 −0.30 0.28 0.93
4 Preoperative CVC—phoneme score* 0.14 −0.16 0.44 0.35
5 Preoperative PTA3 0.17 −0.20 0.54 0.37
6 Postoperative PTA3 −0.19 −0.65 0.26 0.40
7 Electrode type
Precurved Ref.
Straight −11.79 −20.42 −1.39 0.03
8 Scalar trajectory (cat.)
All scala tympani Ref.
All scala vestibuli −1.00 −11.26 9.66 0.87
Translocation −0.53 −9.70 8.84 0.92

Participants with missing data were excluded from the model (n = 9); four were excluded due to inability to score scalar location because of poor-quality CT scan due to movement artifacts, three were excluded due to missing CVC50 outcome measurement, and two were excluded for both reasons. The proportion of variance explained by the model in this table was 11%, the degrees of freedom were 9, 110, and 119, respectively, for the model, the residual and the total.

*This is 1 factor (Pre-operative CVC-phoneme score). The significance is just like with all other factors in final column of the table (p = 0.35).

BSc, Bachelor of Science; CVC, consonant–vowel–consonant; PTA3, pure-tone average (in dB) over.